Evaluation of the WRF/Chem aerosol models - a dust episode case study

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی‌

نویسندگان

1 Ph.D student, Atmospheric Science and Meteorological Research Center (ASMERC)

2 Associate professor, Atmospheric Science and Meteorological Research Center (ASMERC)

3 Assistant Professor, Atmospheric Science and Meteorological Research Center (ASMERC)

4 Associate Professor, Atmospheric Science and Meteorological Research Center (ASMERC)

چکیده

Presented herein is an analysis of an intensive dust intrusion of 8-11 February, 2015. The intrusion has been associated with the development of an intense front over the Middle East. During the episode, dust concentrations in Ahvaz air quality monitoring station in south-western Iran (Khuzestan region) reached over 10000 μg/m3, which was beyond the capacity of air quality sensors to be recorded. In this paper, the performance of WRF/Chem modelling system was evaluated for the west and southwestern Iran as well as the whole model domain. MADE and GOCART models as the main aerosol models implemented in WRF/Chem V3.6 were verified by ground observation data for the specific points. We have taken into account the advantages and disadvantages of MADE and GOCART aerosol models over the study period, by comparing the simulations' results for the specific points with the available dust concentration data. The time series of the area-average of modeled dust column mass density over the test area determined a coherent temporal variation with that of MERRA-2 model which shows the sensitivity of WRF/Chem modeling system for this area with most frequent dust storm events in the Middle East. The validation of WRF/Chem V3.6 modeling system results for the overall model domain is implemented using Hovmoller diagrams. The modeled latitude-average of dust column mass density for the whole model domain showed some discrepancies of dust transport pattern with the results of MERRA-2 model. Although there is a considerable difference between the modelled dust concentrations and the observations especially on the peak values, the temporal variations of the modelled dust concentration with MADE aerosol model is quite consistent with the observations. The results of MADE aerosol model for the dust concentration were more close to the observations of the points inside Khuzestan and surrounding low level plains with aeolian soils. The GOCART aerosol model had more reasonable simulation results for the points through the mountainous terrains of western Iran. It can be concluded that the structure of MADE and GOCART aerosol models can be revised with regard to their relative advantages in specific regions to minimize the error in modeling dust behavior. Scince this study has been employed on a dust episode, and considering that the gaseous air pollutants require the emissions data, the simulations of the gaseous aerosols has not been considered in this study. However, the results of the WRF/Chem model for the dust aerosols could be extended to the other aerosols, especially PM10 and PM2.5 particles.
 

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات


عنوان مقاله [English]

Evaluation of the WRF/Chem aerosol models - a dust episode case study

نویسندگان [English]

  • Amirhossein Nikfal 1
  • Abbas Ranjbar SaadatAbadi 2
  • Mehdi Rahnama 3
  • sahar tajbakhsh 3
  • Mohamad Moradi 4
1 Ph.D student, Atmospheric Science and Meteorological Research Center (ASMERC)
2 Associate professor, Atmospheric Science and Meteorological Research Center (ASMERC)
3 Assistant Professor, Atmospheric Science and Meteorological Research Center (ASMERC)
4 Associate Professor, Atmospheric Science and Meteorological Research Center (ASMERC)
چکیده [English]

Presented herein is an analysis of an intensive dust intrusion of 8-11 February, 2015. The intrusion has been associated with the development of an intense front over the Middle East. During the episode, dust concentrations in Ahvaz air quality monitoring station in south-western Iran (Khuzestan region) reached over 10000 μg/m3, which was beyond the capacity of air quality sensors to be recorded. In this paper, the performance of WRF/Chem modelling system was evaluated for the west and southwestern Iran as well as the whole model domain. MADE and GOCART models as the main aerosol models implemented in WRF/Chem V3.6 were verified by ground observation data for the specific points. We have taken into account the advantages and disadvantages of MADE and GOCART aerosol models over the study period, by comparing the simulations' results for the specific points with the available dust concentration data. The time series of the area-average of modeled dust column mass density over the test area determined a coherent temporal variation with that of MERRA-2 model which shows the sensitivity of WRF/Chem modeling system for this area with most frequent dust storm events in the Middle East. The validation of WRF/Chem V3.6 modeling system results for the overall model domain is implemented using Hovmoller diagrams. The modeled latitude-average of dust column mass density for the whole model domain showed some discrepancies of dust transport pattern with the results of MERRA-2 model. Although there is a considerable difference between the modelled dust concentrations and the observations especially on the peak values, the temporal variations of the modelled dust concentration with MADE aerosol model is quite consistent with the observations. The results of MADE aerosol model for the dust concentration were more close to the observations of the points inside Khuzestan and surrounding low level plains with aeolian soils. The GOCART aerosol model had more reasonable simulation results for the points through the mountainous terrains of western Iran. It can be concluded that the structure of MADE and GOCART aerosol models can be revised with regard to their relative advantages in specific regions to minimize the error in modeling dust behavior. Scince this study has been employed on a dust episode, and considering that the gaseous air pollutants require the emissions data, the simulations of the gaseous aerosols has not been considered in this study. However, the results of the WRF/Chem model for the dust aerosols could be extended to the other aerosols, especially PM10 and PM2.5 particles.
 

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • WRF/Chem
  • Dust
  • Aerosol models
  • Middle East
Acker, J. G., & Leptoukh, G. (2007). Online Analysis Enhances Use of NASA Earth Science Data. Eos, EOS, Trans. Am. Geophys. Union. 88(2), 14. http://doi.org/10.1029/2007EO020003
Ackermann, I. J., Hass, H., Memmesheimer, M., Ebel, A., Binkowski, F. S., & Shankar, U. (1998). Modal Aerosol Dynamics model for Europe: Development and first applications. Atmos. Environ. 32(17), 2981–2999. http://doi.org/10.1016/S1352-2310(98)00006-5
Alijani, A., Ghadimvand, N.K., Aleali, M., Espahbod, M.R. and Meysami, A. (2016) Evaluating Sediment Production Caused by the Lithology of the Geological Formations in Sedimentary Basins (Case Study: Lali Area, Khuzestan, Iran). Open Journal of Geology, 6, 996-1013. doi: 10.4236/ojg.2016.69075.
Al Senafi, F. and Anis, A. (2015), Shamals and climate variability in the Northern Arabian/Persian Gulf from 1973 to 2012. Int. J. Climatol., 35: 4509–4528. doi:10.1002/joc.4302
Baltzer, F., & Purser, B. H. (1990). Modern alluvial fan and deltaic sedimentation in a foreland tectonic setting: the Lower Mesopotamian Plain and the Arabian Gulf. Sedimentary Geology, 67(3–4), 175–197. http://doi.org/10.1016/0037-0738(90)90034-Q
Binkowski, F. S., & Shankar, U. (1995). The Regional Particulate Matter Model. 1. Model description and preliminary results. J. Geophys. Res. 100(D12), 26191–26209. Retrieved from http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-0029478428&partnerID=tZOtx3y1
Carvalho, D., Rocha, A., Gómez-Gesteira, M., & Santos, C. (2012). A sensitivity study of the WRF model in wind simulation for an area of high wind energy. Environ. Model. Softw. 33, 23–34. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2012.01.019
Carvalho, D., Rocha, A., Gomez-Gesteira, M., & Silva Santos, C. (2014). Sensitivity of the WRF model wind simulation and wind energy production estimates to planetary boundary layer parameterizations for onshore and offshore areas in the Iberian Peninsula. Appl. Energy. 135, 234–246. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2014.08.082
Description of the GEOS-5 model changes between the MERRA and MERRA-2 systems: Molod, A., Takacs, L., Suarez, M., and Bacmeister, J., 2015: Development of the GEOS-5 atmospheric general circulation model: evolution from MERRA to MERRA2, Geosci. Model Dev., 8, 1339-1356, doi:10.5194/gmd-8-1339-2015. Link.
Description of the mass constraint used in MERRA-2:
Takacs, L. L., M. Suarez, and R. Todling, 2015. Maintaining Atmospheric Mass and Water Balance Within Reanalysis. NASA/TM–2014-104606, Vol. 37 Document.
Description of the observation corrected precipitation process used in MERRA-2:
Reichle, R., Q. Liu, R. Koster, C. Draper, S. Mahanama, and G. Partyka, 2017. Land Surface Precipitation in MERRA-2. J. Clim. doi:10.1175/JCLI-D-16-0570.1 Link.
Erisman, J. W., Van Pul, A., & Wyers, P. (1994). Parametrization of surface resistance for the quantification of atmospheric deposition of acidifying pollutants and ozone. Atmos. Environ. 28(16), 2595–2607. http://doi.org/10.1016/1352-2310(94)90433-2
Fast, J.D., Gustafson Jr, W.I., Easter, R.C., Zaveri, R.A., Barnard, J.C., Chapman, E.G., Grell, G.A. and Peckham, S.E., 2006. Evolution of ozone, particulates, and aerosol direct radiative forcing in the vicinity of Houston using a fully coupled meteorology‐chemistry‐aerosol model. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 111(D21).
Forkel, R., Balzarini, A., Baró, R., Bianconi, R., Curci, G., Jiménez-Guerrero, P., Žabkar, R. (2015). Analysis of the WRF-Chem contributions to AQMEII phase2 with respect to aerosol radiative feedbacks on meteorology and pollutant distributions. Atmos. Environ. 115, 630–645. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2014.10.056
Forkel, R., Werhahn, J., Buus Hansen, A., McKeen, S., Peckham, S., Grell, G., Suppan, P. (2012). Effect of aerosol-radiation feedback on regional air quality, a case study with WRF/Chem, Atmos. Environ. 53, 202-211. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2011.10.009
Grell, G. A., Peckham, S. E., Schmitz, R., McKeen, S. A., Frost, G., Skamarock, W. C., & Eder, B. (2005). Fully coupled “online” chemistry within the WRF model. Atmos. Environ. 39(37), 6957–6975. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2005.04.027
Hamidi, M., Kavianpour, M. R., & Shao, Y. (2013). Synoptic analysis of dust storms in the Middle East. Asia-Pac. J. Atmos. Sci. 49(3), 279–286. http://doi.org/10.1007/s13143-013-0027-9
Hamidi, M., Kavianpour, M. R., & Shao, Y. (2014). Numerical simulation of dust events in the Middle East. Aeolian Res. 13, 59–70. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.aeolia.2014.02.002
Hong, SY., Dudhia, J., Chen, SH. (2004). A revised approach to ice microphysical processes for the bulk parameterization of clouds and precipitation, Mon. Weather Rev. 132 (1), 103-120. http://dx.doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(2004)132%3C0103:ARATIM%3E2.0.CO;2
Hsu, N. C., Gautam, R., Sayer, A. M., Bettenhausen, C., Li, C., Jeong, M. J., Tsay, S. C., & Holben, B. N. (2012). Global and regional trends of aerosol optical depth over land and ocean using SeaWiFS measurements from 1997 to 2010. Atmos. Chem. Phys. http://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-8037-2012
In, H. J., & Park, S. U. (2003). Estimation of dust emission amount for a dust storm event occurred in April 1998 in China. Water Air Soil Pollut. 148(1–4), 201–221. http://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025400921908
Jish Prakash, P., Stenchikov, G., Kalenderski, S., Osipov, S., & Bangalath, H. (2015). The impact of dust storms on the Arabian Peninsula and the Red Sea. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 15(1), 199–222. http://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-199-2015
Kalenderski, S., Stenchikov, G., & Zhao, C. (2013). Modeling a typical winter-time dust event over the Arabian Peninsula and the Red Sea. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 13(4), 1999–2014. http://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-1999-2013
Kumar, R., Barth, M. C., Pfister, G. G., Naja, M., & Brasseur, G. P. (2014). WRF-Chem simulations of a typical pre-monsoon dust storm in northern India: Influences on aerosol optical properties and radiation budget. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 14(5), 2431–2446. http://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-2431-2014
Mashayekhi, R., Irannejad, P., Aliakbari Bidokhti, A., & Feichter, J. (2009). Implementation of a new aerosol HAM model within the Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) modeling system, Geosci. Model Dev. Discuss. Discussions 01/2009; DOI: 10.5194/gmdd-2-681-2009
Mattar, C., & Borvarán, D. (2016). Offshore wind power simulation by using WRF in the central coast of Chile. Renew. Energy. 94, 22–31. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2016.03.005
NCAR Command Language (Version 6.3.0) [Software]. (2015). Boulder, Colorado: UCAR/NCAR/CISL/TDD. http://dx.doi.org/10.5065/D6WD3XH5
Perrone,  T.J., 1979: Winter  Shamal  in  the Persian Gulf, Naval  Environmental  Prediction Research Facility (NAVENVPREDRSCHFAC) Technical Report TR 79-06, Monterey, CA, USA.
Salma, I., Dal Maso, M., Kulmala, M., & Ray, G. Z. (2002). Modal characteristics of particulate matter in urban atmospheric aerosols. Microchem. J. (Vol. 73, pp. 19–26). http://doi.org/10.1016/S0026-265X(02)00046-2
Schell, B., Ackermann, I. J., Hass, H., Binkowski, F. S., & Ebel, A. (2001). Modeling the formation of secondary organic aerosol within a comprehensive air quality model system. J. Geophys. Res. Atmospheres. http://doi.org/10.1029/2001JD000384
Torres, O., Bhartia, P. K., Herman, J. R., Ahmad, Z., & Gleason, J. (1998). Derivation of aerosol properties from satellite measurements of backscattered ultraviolet radiation: Theoretical basis. J. Geophys. Res. Atmospheres, 103(D14), 17099–17110. http://doi.org/10.1029/98JD00900
Voutilainen, A., & Kaipio, J. P. (2002). Estimation of time-varying aerosol size distributions - Exploitation of modal aerosol dynamical models. J. Aerosol Sci. 33(8), 1181–1200. http://doi.org/10.1016/S0021-8502(02)00062-9
Wang, K., Zhang, Y., Yahya, K., Wu, S. Y., & Grell, G. (2015). Implementation and initial application of new chemistry-aerosol options in WRF/Chem for simulating secondary organic aerosols and aerosol indirect effects for regional air quality. Atmos. Environ. 115, 716–732. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2014.12.007
Wesley, M. L., 1989: Parameterization of surface resistance to gaseous dry deposition in regional numerical models. Atmos. Environ. 16, 1293-1304
WMO No-1121 Technical report of Establishing a WMO Sand and Dust Storm Warning Advisory and Assessment System Regional Node for West Asia: Current Capabilities and Needs, 2013
Wu, L., Su, H., Kalashnikova, O. V., Jiang, J. H., Zhao, C., Garay, M. J., Campbell, J. R., and Yu, N.: WRF-Chem simulation of aerosol seasonal variability in the San Joaquin Valley, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 7291-7309, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-7291-2017, 2017.
Yu, Y., Notaro, M., Liu, Z., Wang, F., Alkolibi, F., Fadda, E., & Bakhrjy, F. (2015). Climatic controls on the interannual to decadal variability in Saudi Arabian dust activity: Toward the development of a seasonal dust prediction model. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos. 120(5), 1739–1758. http://doi.org/10.1002/2014JD022611
Zakey, A. S., Solmon, F., & Giorgi, F. (2006). Implementation and testing of a desert dust module in a regional climate model. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 6(12), 4687–4704. http://doi.org/10.5194/acp-6-4687-2006.