Investigation of the strength and trend of seismic anisotropy beneath the Zagros collision zone

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی‌

نویسندگان

1 موسسه ژئوفیزیک دانشگاه تهران

2 Institute of Geosciences, Goethe-University Frankfurt, Germany

چکیده

The Zagros collision zone is known as an active tectonic zone that represents the tectonic boundary between the Eurasian and Arabian plates. A popular strategy for gaining insight into the upper mantle processes is to examine the splitting of seismic shear waves and interpret them in terms of upper mantle anisotropy and deformation. Core phases SK(K)S from over 278 earthquakes (MW ≥ 6.0) occurred between years 2010 and 2017 at epicentral distances between 90° and 145° are examined, which were recorded by 27 broadband stations located in the Zagros collision zone. In compressional tectonic regimes such as the Zagros collision zone, a dominant pure shear deformation in the mantle is expected that could develop lattice preferred orientation (thus anisotropic fabrics) subparallel to the strike of the mountain belt. The findings show that the majority of the fast axes of seismic anisotropy are oriented in the NE-SW direction (perpendicular to the trend of the belt) with delay times (a proxy for the strength of anisotropy) varying between 1 and 1.5 seconds. If deformation in the mantle lithosphere was the main factor of the observed anisotropy, then the fast direction of anisotropy would be parallel to the belt. Therefore, the main source of anisotropy is thought to be residing in the sub-lithosphere mantle. Crack-induced anisotropy in the upper crust that can be perpendicular to the trend of the belt (parallel to the maximum compressional stress direction) may also have some contribution to the observed splitting of shear-waves.

کلیدواژه‌ها


عنوان مقاله [English]

Investigation of the strength and trend of seismic anisotropy beneath the Zagros collision zone

نویسندگان [English]

  • Seyed-Jasser Motavalli-Anbaran 1
  • Ali Moradi 1
  • Ayoub Kaviani 2
1 Institute of Geophysics, University of Tehran, Tehran
2 Institute of Geosciences, Goethe-University Frankfurt, Germany
چکیده [English]

The Zagros collision zone is known as an active tectonic zone that represents the tectonic boundary between the Eurasian and Arabian plates. A popular strategy for gaining insight into the upper mantle processes is to examine the splitting of seismic shear waves and interpret them in terms of upper mantle anisotropy and deformation. Core phases SK(K)S from over 278 earthquakes (MW ≥ 6.0) occurred between years 2010 and 2017 at epicentral distances between 90° and 145° are examined, which were recorded by 27 broadband stations located in the Zagros collision zone. In compressional tectonic regimes such as the Zagros collision zone, a dominant pure shear deformation in the mantle is expected that could develop lattice preferred orientation (thus anisotropic fabrics) subparallel to the strike of the mountain belt. The findings show that the majority of the fast axes of seismic anisotropy are oriented in the NE-SW direction (perpendicular to the trend of the belt) with delay times (a proxy for the strength of anisotropy) varying between 1 and 1.5 seconds. If deformation in the mantle lithosphere was the main factor of the observed anisotropy, then the fast direction of anisotropy would be parallel to the belt. Therefore, the main source of anisotropy is thought to be residing in the sub-lithosphere mantle. Crack-induced anisotropy in the upper crust that can be perpendicular to the trend of the belt (parallel to the maximum compressional stress direction) may also have some contribution to the observed splitting of shear-waves.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • seismic anisotropy
  • shear‌-wave splitting
  • SKS splitting
  • Zagros
Alavi, M., 1994, Tectonics of the Zagros orogenic belt of Iran: new data and interpretations, 229, 211-238.
Argus, D. F., Gordon, R. G. and DeMets, C., 2011, Geologically current motion of 56 plates relative to the no net rotation reference frame: Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems, 12(11).
Barazangi, M., Sandvol, E., and Seber, D., 2006, Structure and tectonic evolution of the Anatolian plateau in eastern Turkey: Geological Society of America, special papers, 409, 463–473.
Berberian, M., 1995, Natural Hazards and the First Earthquake Catalogue of Iran, Volume 1: Historical Hazards in Iran Prior to 1900. A UNESCO/IIEES Publication during UN/IDNDR, 649 p., IIEES, Tehran.
Dewey, J., Hempton, M., Kidd, W., Saroglu, F. T., and Şengör, A., 1986, Shortening of continental lithosphere: the neotectonics of Eastern Anatolia—a young collision zone, 19, 1-36.
Fouch, M. J., Fischer, K. M., Parmentier, E. M., Wysession, M. E., and Clarke, T. J., 2000, Shear wave splitting, continental keels, and patterns of mantle flow: Journal of Geophysical Research, Solid Earth, 105(B3), 6255-6275.
Jackson, J., and McKenzie, D., 1984, Active tectonics of the Alpine–Himalayan Belt between western Turkey and Pakistan: Geophysical Journal International, 77(1), 185-264.
Jung, H., and Karato, S. I., 2001, Water-induced fabric transitions in olivine: Science, 293(5534), 1460-1463.
Jung, H., Mo, W., and Green, H. W., 2009, Upper mantle seismic anisotropy resulting from pressure-induced slip transition in olivine: Nature Geoscience, 2(1), 73.
Karato, S.I., Jung, H., Katayama, I. and Skemer, P., 2008. Geodynamic significance of seismic anisotropy of the upper mantle: new insights from laboratory studies. Annu. Rev. Earth Planet. Sci., 36, 59-95.
Karato, S. I., 2012, Deformation of earth materials: an introduction to the rheology of solid earth: Cambridge University Press.
Kaviani, A., Paul, A., Bourova, E., Hatzfeld, D., Pedersen, H., and Mokhtari, M., 2007, A strong seismic velocity contrast in the shallow mantle across the Zagros collision zone (Iran): Geophysical Journal International, 171(1), 399-410.
Kaviani, A., Hatzfeld, D., Paul, A., Tatar, M., and Priestley, K., 2009, Shear-wave splitting, lithospheric anisotropy, and mantle deformation beneath the Arabia–Eurasia collision zone in Iran: Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 286(3), 371-378.
Kaviani, A., Hofstetter, R., Rümpker, G., and Weber, M., 2013, Investigation of seismic anisotropy beneath the Dead Sea fault using dense networks of broadband stations: Journal of Geophysical Research, Solid Earth, 118(7), 3476-3491.
Kennett, B. L. N., Engdahl, E. R., and Buland, R., 1995, Constraints on seismic velocities in the earth from travel times: Geophysical Journal International, 122, 108-124.
Kearey, P., Brooks, M., and Hill, I., 2013, An introduction to geophysical exploration: John Wiley and Sons.
Keshvari, F., Shomali, Z. H., Tatar, M., and Kaviani, A., 2011, Upper-mantle S-velocity structure across the Zagros collision zone resolved by nonlinear teleseismic tomography: Journal of Seismology, 15(2), 329-339.
Latifi, K., Kaviani, A., Rümpker, G., Mahmoodabadi, M., Ghassemi, M. R., and Sadidkhouy, A., 2018, The effect of crustal anisotropy on SKS splitting analysis—synthetic models and real-data observations: Geophysical Journal International, 213(2), 1426-1447.
Long, M. D., and Silver, P. G., 2009, Shear wave splitting and mantle anisotropy: measurements, interpretations, and new directions: Surveys in Geophysics, 30(4-5), 407-461.
Mainprice, D., 2007, Seismic anisotropy of the deep Earth from a mineral and rock physics perspective. In: Schubert G (ed) Treatise on geophysics, Elsevier, Oxford, 2, 437–49.
Paul, A., Karabulut, H., Mutlu, A. K., and Salaün, G., 2014, A comprehensive and densely sampled map of shear-wave azimuthal anisotropy in the Aegean–Anatolia region: Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 389, 14-22.
Priestley, K., McKenzie, D., Barron, J., Tatar, M., and Debayle, E., 2012, The Zagros core: deformation of the continental lithospheric mantle: Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems, 13(11).
Raeesi, M., Zarifi, Z., Nilfouroushan, F., Boroujeni, S. A., and Tiampo, K., 2017, Quantitative Analysis of Seismicity in Iran: Pure and Applied Geophysics, 174(3), 793-833.
Savage, M. K., 1999, Seismic anisotropy and mantle deformation: what have we learned from shear wave splitting?: Reviews of Geophysics, 37(1), 65-106.
Sella, G. F., Dixon, T. H., and Mao, A., 2002, REVEL, A model for recent plate velocities from space geodesy, Journal of Geophysical Research, Solid Earth, 107(B4).
Sepehr, M., and Cosgrove, J. W., 2005, Role of the Kazerun Fault Zone in the formation and deformation of the Zagros Fold Thrust Belt, Iran: Tectonics, 24(5).
Sileny, J., and Plomerova, J., 1996, Inversion of shear-wave splitting parameters to retrieve three-dimensionalorientation of anisotropy in continental lithosphere: Physics of the Earth and Planetary Interiors, 95, 277–292.
Silver, P. G., and Chan, W. W., 1991, Shear wave splitting and subcontinental mantle deformation: Journal of Geophysical Research, Solid Earth, 96(B10), 16429-16454.
Silver, P. G., 1996. Seismic anisotropy beneath the continents, Probing the depths of geology: Annual Review of Earth and Planetary Sciences, 24(1), 385-432.
Sleep, N. H., 1997, Lateral flow and ponding of starting plume material: Journal of Geophysical Research, Solid Earth, 102(B5), 10001-10012.
Sleep, N. H., Ebinger, C. J., and Kendall, J. M., 2002, Deflection of mantle plume material by cratonic keels: Geological Society, London, Special Publications, 199(1), 135-150.
Snyder, D. B., and Barazangi, M., 1986, Deep crustal structure and flexure of the Arabian plate beneath the Zagros collisional mountain belt as inferred from gravity observation: Tectonics, 5(3), 361-373.
Stein, S., and Wysession, M., 2009, An introduction to seismology, earthquakes, and earth structure: John Wiley and Sons.
Vecsey, L., Plomerova, J., and Babuska, V., 2008, Shear-wave splitting measurements—problems and solutions: Tectonophysics, 462, 178–196.
Vinnik, L. P., Makeyeva, L. I., Milev, A., and Usenko, A. Y., 1992, Global patterns of azimuthal anisotropy and deformations in the continental mantle: Geophysical Journal International, 111(3), 433-447.
Vinnik, L. P., Farra, V., and Romanowicz, B., 1989, Azimuthal anisotropy in the Earth from observations of SKS at Geoscope and NARS broadband stations: Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 79(5), 1542-1558.
Waltham, T., 2014, Foundations of engineering geology: CRC Press.
Wessel, P., and Smith, W. H., 1998, New, improved version of Generic Mapping Tools released: Eos, Transactions American Geophysical Union, 79(47), 579-579.