Iranian Journal of Geophysics

Iranian Journal of Geophysics

Assessment of the performance of the ensemble mean of an ensmble forecastiong system developed for the WRF model for weather prediction: A case study over the west part of Iran

Document Type : Research Article

Authors
1 Ph.D. Student, Department of Water Science and Engineering, Faculty of Agriculture, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Mashhad, Iran
2 Professor, Department of Water Science and Engineering, Faculty of Agriculture, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Mashhad, Iran
3 Associate Professor, Department of Geography, Faculty of Letters and Humanities, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Mashhad, Iran
4 Professor, Department of Physics Space, Institute of Geophysics, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran
Abstract
The use of meteorological models is one of the most suitable methods for forecasting atmospheric conditions. However, due to the complex nature of the atmosphere, these models sometimes struggle to provide accurate predictions. Innovative methods are being developed to enhance forecasting accuracy, among which the ensemble forecasting method is notable. This study presents results from the development of an ensemble forecasting system for the WRF model aimed at predicting 10-meter wind fields, air temperature, and 24-hour cumulative precipitation in western Iran. To develop the ensemble model, members of the ensemble system were created by combining three selected configurations and introducing perturbations in the model's initial conditions using a Monte Carlo method. Additionally, in the WRF model simulations for each ensemble member, three nested domains with horizontal resolutions of 27, 9, and 3 kilometers were utilized. The results were analyzed using statistical metrics such as Mean Absolute Error (MAE), Root Mean Square Error (RMSE), and Kling-Gupta Efficiency (KGE) in comparison with observational data from existing stations in the region. For 72-hour predictions of wind components at a height of 10 meters above ground level, the RMSE was found to be 2.31 meters per second, while for 2-meter air temperature, it was 2.75 degrees Celsius. These results indicate that the ensemble mean is effective for predicting these variables given the region's topographical conditions. The model's performance in predicting precipitation was evaluated using four statistical metrics for events exceeding two categories. The False Alarm Ratio (FAR) indicated that there were many false alarms for precipitation amounts between 1 and 10 millimeters, while the Heidke Skill Score (HSS) demonstrated high skill relative to random forecasts in this range. Furthermore, the model showed good capability in identifying actual precipitation events and performed well for rainfall amounts exceeding 50 millimeters; however, slight over-predictions were noted in other cases. The model faced its greatest challenges in predicting variables within the mountainous areas of the region during forecast days.
Keywords

Subjects


خسرو اشرفی، سرمد قادر و عبداله صداقت کردار. "اعمال روش پیش بینی همادی breeding به مدل تحقیقاتی-عملیاتی WRF." هشتمین همایش پیش بینی عددی وضع هوا، تهران.
رضازاده، مریم، مرادیان، فاطمه، قادر، سرمد. (1398). بررسی عملکرد سامانه همادی چند‌فیزیکی مدل میان‌مقیاس WRF جهت شبیه‌سازی بارش در مناطق مرکزی ایران. مجله ژئوفیزیک ایران، 14(1)، 13-38.
سرمد قادر; دانیال یازجی; محسن سلطان پور; محمد حسین نعمتی. "به‌کارگیری یک سامانه همادی توسعه داده‌شده برای مدل WRF جهت پیش‌بینی میدان باد سطحی در محدوده خلیج فارس"، هیدروفیزیک، 1، 1، 1394، 41-54.
سرمد قادر، دانیال یازجی، حسین شهبازی، پیش‌بینی میدان باد و سایر میدان‌های هواشناسی در محدوده شهر تهران با استفاده از یک سامانه همادی توسعه داده شده برای مدل  جهت استفاده در مدل‌های آلودگی هوا، چهارمین همایش ملی مدیریت آلودگی هوا و صدا، تهران، 22 تا 23 دی ماه 1394.
سرمد قادر، دانیال یازجی، محسن سلطان‌پور و محمدحسین نعمتی، به‌کارگیری یک سامانه همادی توسعه داده شده برای مدل جهت پیش‌بینی میدان باد سطحی در محدوده خلیج فارس،  مجله‌ هیدروفیزیک، جلد 1 شماره ، صفحات 41 تا 54، 1395.
سرمد قادر، محمود صفر و رضا جوان‌نژاد، ارزیابی عملکرد اعضای یک سامانه همادی توسعه داده شده برای مدل ، نوزدهمین کنفرانس ژئوفیزیک ایران، تهران، 14 و 15 آبان 1399.
سرمد قادر، محمود صفر، رضا جوان‌نژاد، پیش‌بینی برخی میدان‌های هواشناسی با استفاده از یک سامانه همادی توسعه داده شده برای مدل : مطالعه موردی اولین کنفرانس بین‌المللی پیش‌بینی عددی وضع هوا و اقلیم، تهران، 28 تا 29 آبان 1397.
مائده فتحی; مجید آزادی; غلامعلی کمالی; امیرحسن مشکاتی. "استفاده از سامانه همادی با چند مدل برای پیش‌بینی بارش روی ایران"، نیوار، 43، 106-107، 1398، 72-78.
Bari, M. (2024). Performance evaluation of a national seven-day ensemble streamflow forecast service for australia. Water, 16(10),
 
      1438.
Chai, T. and Draxler, R. (2014). Root mean square error (rmse) or mean absolute error (mae)? – arguments against avoiding rmse in the literature. Geoscientific Model Development, 7(3), 1247-1250.
Chang, C., Yang, S., & Keppenne, C. (2014). Applications of the mean recentering scheme to improve typhoon track prediction: a case study of typhoon nanmadol (2011). Journal of the Meteorological Society of Japan Ser Ii, 92(6), 559-584.
Chen, J., Li, X., Xu, C., Zhang, X., Xiong, L., & Guo, Q. (2022). Postprocessing ensemble weather forecasts for introducing multisite and multivariable correlations using rank shuffle and copula theory. Monthly Weather Review, 150(3), 551-565.
Cho, J. (2023). Innovative imaging and analysis techniques for quantifying spalling repair materials in concrete pavements. Sustainability, 16(1), 112.
Deng, J., Deng, Y., & Cheong, K. (2021). Combining conflicting evidence based on pearson correlation coefficient and weighted graph. International Journal of Intelligent Systems, 36(12), 7443-7460.
Deng, L. (2014). A tutorial survey of architectures, algorithms, and applications for deep learning. Apsipa Transactions on Signal and Information Processing, 3(1).
Diallo, M. (2024). Wind speed ramp rate predictions using wind farm scada data assimilation and a wrf ensemble. Journal of Physics Conference Series, 2745(1), 012015.
Fathi, M., Azadi, M., Kamali, G., & Meshkatee, A. H. (2019). Improving precipitation forecasts over iran using a weighted average ensemble technique. Journal of Earth System Science, 128(5).
Gallus, W. A. (2010). Application of object-based verification techniques to ensemble precipitation forecasts. Weather and Forecasting, 25(1), 144-158.
Ghader S., Yazgi D., Soltanpour M., Nemati M.H., “On the use of an ensemble forecasting system for prediction of surface wind over the Persian Gulf” in proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Coasts, Ports and Marine Structures (ICOPMAS 2016), Tehran, Iran, 31 Oct. 2 Nov. 2016.
Gneiting, T., Raftery, A., Westveld, A., & Goldman, T. (2005). Calibrated probabilistic forecasting using ensemble model output statistics and minimum crps estimation. Monthly Weather Review, 133(5).
Grönquist, P., Yao, C., Ben-Nun, T., Dryden, N., Dueben, P., Li, S., … & Hoefler, T. (2021). Deep learning for post-processing ensemble weather forecasts. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society a Mathematical Physical and Engineering Sciences, 379(2194), 20200092.
Gustineli, M. (2022). A survey on recently proposed activation functions for deep learning..
Hines, K. and Bromwich, D. (2008). Development and testing of polar weather research and forecasting (wrf) model. part i: greenland ice sheet meteorology*. Monthly Weather Review, 136(6), 1971-1989.
Hyvärinen, O. (2014). A probabilistic derivation of heidke skill score. Weather and Forecasting, 29(1), 177-181.
Jha, D., et al. (2019). NOMAD: A distributed web-based platform for managing materials science research data. *Journal of Physics: Materials*, 2, 036001.
Kirkwood, C., Economou, T., Odbert, H., & Pugeault, N. (2021). A framework for probabilistic weather forecast post-processing across models and lead times using machine learning. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society a Mathematical Physical and Engineering Sciences, 379(2194), 20200099.
Kramer, M., Heinzeller, D., Hartmann, H., Berg, W., & Steeneveld, G. (2018). Assessment of mpas variable resolution simulations in the grey-zone of convection against wrf model results and observations. Climate Dynamics, 55(1-2), 253-276.
Lee, M. and Chen, Y. (2021). Precipitation modeling for extreme weather based on sparse hybrid machine learning and markov chain random field in a multi-scale subspace. Water, 13(9), 1241.
Li, L. (2024). Generative emulation of weather forecast ensembles with diffusion models. Science Advances, 10(13).
Lovejoy, S., Schertzer, D., Allaire, V., Bourgeois, T., King, S., Pinel, J., … & Stolle, J. (2009). Atmospheric complexity or scale by scale simplicity?. Geophysical Research Letters, 36(1).
Luo, Y., Xu, X., Liu, Y., Chao, H., Chu, H., Chen, L., … & Wang, J. (2022). Robust precipitation bias correction through an ordinal distribution autoencoder. Ieee Intelligent Systems, 37(1), 60-70.
Lynch, P. (2008). The origins of computer weather prediction and climate modeling. Journal of Computational Physics, 227(7), 3431-3444.
Lynch, P. (2016). An artist's impression of richardson's fantastic forecast factory. Weather, 71(1), 14-18.
Miyoshi, T. and Kunii, M. (2011). The local ensemble transform kalman filter with the weather research and forecasting model: experiments with real observations. Pure and Applied Geophysics, 169(3), 321-333.
Morley, S. (2020). Challenges and opportunities in magnetospheric space weather prediction. Space Weather, 18(3).
Palmer, T., & Hagedorn, R. (Eds.). (2006). Predictability of weather and climate. Cambridge University Press.
Rasp, S. and Lerch, S. (2018). Neural networks for postprocessing ensemble weather forecasts. Monthly Weather Review, 146(11), 3885-3900.
Sengoz, C., Ramanna, S., Kehler, S., Goomer, R., & Pries, P. (2023). Machine learning approaches to improve north american precipitation forecasts. IEEE Access, 11, 97664-97681. https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2023.3309054
Stolaki, S., Pytharoulis, I., & Karacostas, T. (2011). A study of fog characteristics using a coupled wrf–cobel model over thessaloniki airport, greece. Pure and Applied Geophysics, 169(5-6), 961-981.
World Meteorological Organization. (2018). Manual on the Global Data-processing and Forecasting System. World Meteorological Organization.