Iranian Journal of Geophysics

Iranian Journal of Geophysics

Characterization and classification of site selection conditions for geomagnetic observatory placement and their spatial distribution in Tehran province

Document Type : Research Article

Authors
Bahador Shahghobadi 1
Mansoure Montahaei 2
Hojjatollah Ranjbar 3
Loqman Namaki 4
1 M.Sc., Institute of geophysics, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran
2 Associate Professor, Institute of geophysics, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran
3 Professor, Shahid Bahonar, University of Kerman, Kerman, Iran
4 Assistant Professor, Azad university of Sanandaj, Kourdestan, Iran
10.30499/ijg.2026.576589.1756
Abstract
The site selection process for a geomagnetic observatory placement is essentially a rigorous effort to eliminate or minimize all possible sources contaminating observatory measurements now and for the foreseeable future. The performance of a geomagnetic observatory critically depends on the signal-to-noise ratio of the recorded magnetic field components. All EM noise sources that distort this ratio must be identified and considered in site selection. Site selection for geomagnetic observatories traditionally involves evaluating multiple environmental, geological, and infrastructural factors, but without classification, these criteria are often assessed ad hoc, leading to inefficiencies and suboptimal choices. Classification addresses these by enabling systematic, data-driven prioritization of criteria, reducing subjectivity, and facilitating scalable GIS-based multi-criteria evaluations across large regions.
In this study, we first carry out a detailed review and classification of EM noise sources that affect geomagnetic measurements. These sources are grouped into three main categories: (a) artificial EM noise, (b) natural EM noise related to geological, crustal magnetic anomalies and atmospheric processes, and (c) natural hazards that threaten long-term observatory operation. Artificial EM noise includes power transmission and distribution networks (three‑phase high-voltage lines and single‑phase medium-voltage feeders), electrified railways and DC metro systems, buried metallic pipelines with cathodic protection, radio and radar communication systems, and electric security fences. For each of these sources, published case studies and theoretical considerations are used to describe the frequency content, dominant field components, amplitude decay with distance, and recommended minimum distances (e.g., tens of meters to several kilometers) required to avoid strong contamination of geomagnetic records.
Natural EM noise and geophysical conditions are also analyzed as essential criteria. Topographic variations and associated charge accumulation on surface irregularities, spatial changes in crustal magnetic susceptibility inferred from airborne magnetic data, and large-scale atmospheric and ionospheric phenomena can all deform the EM field and reduce the interpretability of observatory data. Moreover, because one of the main tasks of a geomagnetic observatory is to provide long time series for studies of core dynamics, the site must remain stable over time and be protected from destructive geological processes. Therefore, active faults, seismic hazard zones, mass-movement–prone slopes, and other geohazards in Tehran Province are mapped and incorporated as exclusion or low-suitability zones.In the next step, these conceptual criteria are translated into spatial information layers for Tehran Province. Ten main layers are generated for artificial EM noise sources, including the locations of high-voltage transmission lines, oil and gas pipelines, railways and DC metro lines, cities and villages, active mines, industrial zones, power plants, and transformer substations. These data are compiled from national geological and mining databases and from open, collaborative geographic databases and are validated and edited using satellite imagery and GIS tools. Additional layers representing topographic slope derived from SRTM-based digital elevation models, surface water bodies, crustal magnetic anomalies, lithological units, active faults, and seismic hazard zones are also prepared.
Keywords
Geomagnetic observatory
electromagnetic noise
natural hazard
site selection conditions
Tehran
Subjects
حسین‌زاده گویا، ن.، 1379، بررسی محل‌های مناسب پایگاه‌های جدید مغناطیس‌سنجی در چند شهر ایران، م. فیزیک زمین و فضا، 26(2)، 27-17.
Chave, A. D., & Jones, A. G. (Eds.). (2012). The magnetotelluric method: Theory and practice. Cambridge University Press.
Crippen, R., Buckley, S., Agram, P., Belz, E., Gurrola, E., Hensley, S., ... & Tung, W. (2016). NASA DEM global elevation model: Methods and progress. The International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, 41, 125-128.
Ferguson, I. J. (2012). Instrumentation and field procedures. The magnetotelluric method, 421-479.
Fujii, I.,& Nagamachi, S. (2022). History of Kakioka Magnetic Observatory. History of Geo-and Space Sciences Discussions, 2022, 1-69.
GFZ German Research Centre for Geosciences. (2016). Geomagnetic Observatories.Journal of large-scale research facilities, 2, A83. http://dx.doi.org/10.17815/jlsrf-2-1361
Hoseinzadeh Gouya, N. (1994). Iranian National Report on the Geomagnetic Activities in Iran. Tehran University Press.
Junge, A. (1996). Characterization of and correction for cultural noise. Surveys in Geophysics, 17(4), 361-391.
Jankowski, J., & Sucksdorff, C. (1996). Guide for magnetic measurements and observatory practice.
Jiracek, G. R. (1990). Near-surface and topographic distortions in electromagnetic induction. Surveys in geophysics, 11(2), 163-203.
Keshi Afshar, H. (1960). Iranian National Report on the Geomagnetic Activities in Iran to the XII General Assembly of the International Union of Geodesy and Geophysics in Helsinki, July 1960. Tehran University Press.
Khomutov, S. Y. (2017). Magnetic observations at Geophysical Observatory Paratunka IKIR FEB RAS: tasks, possibilities and future prospects. In E3S Web of Conferences (Vol. 20, p. 02002). EDP Sciences.
Newhall, C. G.,& Punongbayan, R. S. (Eds.). (1996).Fire and Mud: Eruptions and Lahars of Mount Pinatubo, Philippines.* University of Washington Press.
 
Nieckarz, Z. (2016). Imprints of natural phenomena and human activity observed during 10 years of ELF magnetic measurements at the Hylaty Geophysical Station in Poland. Acta Geophysica, 64(6), 2591-2608.
Mandea, M., & Korte, M. (Eds.). (2010). Geomagnetic observations and models (Vol. 5). Springer Science & Business Media.
Martyn, T., Turbitt, C. W., Baillie, O., Reay, S. J., Clarke, E., Williamson, J., ... & Thompson, V. (2024, November). Relocating Port Stanley Observatory. In XXth IAGA Workshop on Geomagnetic Observatory Instruments, Data Acquisition and Processing.
Oettinger, G., Haak, V., & Larsen, J. C. (2001). Noise reduction in magnetotelluric time-series with a new signal–noise separation method and its application to a field experiment in the Saxonian Granulite Massif. Geophysical Journal International, 146(3), 659-669.
Padilha, A. L., Alves, L. R., Silva, G. B., & Espinosa, K. V. (2017). Effect of a huge crustal conductivity anomaly on the H-component of geomagnetic variations recorded in central South America. Earth, Planets and Space, 69(1), 58.
Rung-Arunwan T, Siripunvaraporn W, Utada H . (2017). Use of ssq rotational invariant of magnetotelluric impedances for estimating informative properties for galvanic distortion. Earth Planets Space 69(1),80.
Ryu, K., Oh, S., & Kwon, H. S. (2024). Vehicle noise characteristics in magnetotelluric data and vehicle noise removal using waveform fitting. Journal of Applied Geophysics, 230, 105534.
Santarelli, L., Palangio, P., & De Lauretis, M. (2014). Electromagnetic background noise at L’Aquila geomagnetic observatory. Annals of Geophysics, 57(2), G0211-G0211.
Stagpoole, V. M., Bennie, S. L., Bibby, H. M., Dravitzki, S., & Ingham, M. R. (2009). Deep structure of a major subduction back thrust: Magneto-telluric investigations of the Taranaki Fault, New Zealand. Tectonophysics, 463(1-4), 77-85.
Szarka, L. (1988). Geophysical aspects of man-made electromagnetic noise in the earth—A review. Surveys in Geophysics, 9(3), 287-318.
Wienert, K. A. (1970). Notes on geomagnetic observatory and survey practice. UNESCO Earth Sciences, 5.
Yazdanabadi, M. I., Hojat, A., Ranjbar, H., & Nasab, S. K. (2017). A geographic information system‐based site selection experience for the construction of a geomagnetic observatory in Kerman Province, Iran. Geophysical Prospecting, 65(S1), 237-245.
Zare, M. (2012). Development of seismic hazard zoning map for Iran, based on new seismic source determination. In Proceedings 15th world conference on earthquake engineering, Lisboa, Portugal September (pp. 24-28).
Iranian Journal of Geophysics
Volume 20, Issue 4
September and October 2026
Pages 35-50

  • Receive Date 18 February 2026
  • Revise Date 04 May 2026
  • Accept Date 24 May 2026
  • First Publish Date 24 May 2026
  • Publish Date 23 July 2026