مجله ژئوفیزیک ایران

مجله ژئوفیزیک ایران

Utilizing support vector regression for magnetic statistical modeling and using a fuzzy inference system for comprehending the status of subsurface structures

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی‌

نویسندگان
1 M.Sc., Department of Mining Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Urmia University, Urmia, Iran
2 Associate Professor, Department of Mining Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Urmia University, Urmia, Iran
چکیده
This paper is mainly about creating a novel method for detecting potential subsurface structures in the study area for future investigation. This paper is divided into two sections. In the first section, for notifying the statistical status of data points, two types of support vector regression are proposed. In the second section, by using a fuzzy inference system, potential parts of the study area are detected. For this research, 812 magnetic surveying points were collected in the southern part of Iran with a range of magnetic between. -105.718 to 2.20 two types of SVR are proposed, and in both methods, firstly, an MLP neural network predicts magnetic rates by using easting, northing, and elevation, and in MLP_SVR by trial and error main parameters of SVR  are chosen but in MLP_PSO_SVR optimized parameters of SVR  are chosen by the PSO algorithm. Main parameters of support vector regression are epsilon, penalty term, and kernel function (in this study we choose RBF kernel function), In MLP_SVR, epsilon is 24, penalty term is 27 and sigma of RBF kernel is 12, and optimized parameters in second type are estimated 28.27 for epsilon, and 21.99 for penalty term, and 15.70 for sigma of RBF kernel,, and by this parameters, SVR is performed. In the second section, utilizing unique FIS platform is created, and parameters of this intelligent system are predicted magnetic rate, which is predicted by an MLP neural network, and depth. To obtain depth, Standard Euler deconvolution is offered, which uses least-squares as an inversion method. MLP_SVR puts 753 data points inside model and MLP_PSO_SVR puts 775 data points inside model which means MLP_PSO_SVR has 2.70 % better performance in comparison of  MLP_SVR, in second section, the condition of the subsurface structure is defined, and the outcome of the model illustrates that in this area, if the magnetic rate is more than -80 and Simultaneously, the depth is less than 2000, that parts are proper area for future investigation. Main finding of this study are; (1) MLP_PSO_SVR causes that more data points in comparison of MLP_SVR be inside of Support vector regression model and this proposed type has better performance in comparison of MLP_SVR (2) particle swarm particle is great tool for optimizing main parameters of support vector regression (epsilon, penalty term, and sigma of kernel function) and The function of norm(sin⁡(x)) causes that choosing of optimized parameters of support vector regression becomes attainable   (3) fuzzy inference system creates novel procedure for notifying status of subsurface structure which can be used in future research in study area.
کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات


عنوان مقاله English

Utilizing support vector regression for magnetic statistical modeling and using a fuzzy inference system for comprehending the status of subsurface structures

نویسندگان English

Reza Shahnavehsi 1
Farnusch Hajizadeh 2
1 M.Sc., Department of Mining Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Urmia University, Urmia, Iran
2 Associate Professor, Department of Mining Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Urmia University, Urmia, Iran
چکیده English

This paper is mainly about creating a novel method for detecting potential subsurface structures in the study area for future investigation. This paper is divided into two sections. In the first section, for notifying the statistical status of data points, two types of support vector regression are proposed. In the second section, by using a fuzzy inference system, potential parts of the study area are detected. For this research, 812 magnetic surveying points were collected in the southern part of Iran with a range of magnetic between. -105.718 to 2.20 two types of SVR are proposed, and in both methods, firstly, an MLP neural network predicts magnetic rates by using easting, northing, and elevation, and in MLP_SVR by trial and error main parameters of SVR  are chosen but in MLP_PSO_SVR optimized parameters of SVR  are chosen by the PSO algorithm. Main parameters of support vector regression are epsilon, penalty term, and kernel function (in this study we choose RBF kernel function), In MLP_SVR, epsilon is 24, penalty term is 27 and sigma of RBF kernel is 12, and optimized parameters in second type are estimated 28.27 for epsilon, and 21.99 for penalty term, and 15.70 for sigma of RBF kernel,, and by this parameters, SVR is performed. In the second section, utilizing unique FIS platform is created, and parameters of this intelligent system are predicted magnetic rate, which is predicted by an MLP neural network, and depth. To obtain depth, Standard Euler deconvolution is offered, which uses least-squares as an inversion method. MLP_SVR puts 753 data points inside model and MLP_PSO_SVR puts 775 data points inside model which means MLP_PSO_SVR has 2.70 % better performance in comparison of  MLP_SVR, in second section, the condition of the subsurface structure is defined, and the outcome of the model illustrates that in this area, if the magnetic rate is more than -80 and Simultaneously, the depth is less than 2000, that parts are proper area for future investigation. Main finding of this study are; (1) MLP_PSO_SVR causes that more data points in comparison of MLP_SVR be inside of Support vector regression model and this proposed type has better performance in comparison of MLP_SVR (2) particle swarm particle is great tool for optimizing main parameters of support vector regression (epsilon, penalty term, and sigma of kernel function) and The function of norm(sin⁡(x)) causes that choosing of optimized parameters of support vector regression becomes attainable   (3) fuzzy inference system creates novel procedure for notifying status of subsurface structure which can be used in future research in study area.

کلیدواژه‌ها English

Magnetic surveying
multilayer perceptron
support vector regression
particle swarm optimi-zation
fuzzy inference system
 
Ahamed N. U., Benson L ., Clermont C ., Osis S. T .and Ferber R .; 2017: Fuzzy inference system-    based recognition of slow, medium and fast running conditions using a triaxial accelerometer. Procedia Comput. Sci., 114, 401-407., https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2017.09.054.
Ali, A. F. Tawhid, M. A. (2017). A hybrid particle swarm optimization and genetic algorithm with population partitioning for large scale optimization problems. Ain Shams Engineering Journal, 8(2), 191-206.
Cavallaro F .; 2015: A Takagi-Sugeno fuzzy inference system for developing a sustainability index of biomass., Sustainability., 7(9), 12359-12371, https://doi.org/10.3390/su70912359.
Chang L.-C., Chu H.-J., Chen .and Y.-W .; 2013: A fuzzy inference system for the conjunctive use of surface and subsurface water. Adv. Fuzzy Syst., 2013 (2013)., https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/128393.
Chitralekha S. B.and Shah S. L .; 2010: Application of support vector regression for developing soft sensors for nonlinear processes. Can J Chem Eng., 88(5), 696-709.,  https://doi.org/10.1002/cjce.20363.
Ding, Y., Yang, B., Xu, G., & Wang, X. (2022). Improved Dempster–Shafer evidence theory for tunnel water inrush risk analysis based on fuzzy identification factors of multi-source geophysical data. Remote Sensing, 14(23), 6178.
Dragović I ., Turajlić N ., Pilčević D ., Petrović B .and Radojević D .; 2015: A Boolean consistent fuzzy inference system for diagnosing diseases and its application for determining peritonitis likelihood. Comput Math Methods Med.,2015.,  https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/147947.
Feizi, F., Karbalaei-Ramezanali, A. A., & Farhadi, S. (2021). Application of multivariate regression on magnetic data to determine further drilling site for iron exploration. Open Geosciences, 13(1), 138-147.
Hadiloo, S., Mirzaei, S., Hashemi, H., & Beiranvand, B. (2018). Comparison between unsupervised and supervise fuzzy clustering method in interactive mode to obtain the best result for extract subtle patterns from seismic facies Maps. Geopersia, 8(1), 27-34.
Hunasigi, P., Jedhe, S., Mane, M., & Patil-Shinde, V. (2023). Multilayer perceptron neural network based models for prediction of the rainfall and reference crop evapotranspiration for sub-humid climate of dapoli, ratnagiri District, India. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 43(1), 154-201.
Hunt C. P., Moskowitz B. M. and Banerjee S. K.; 1995: Magnetic properties of rocks and minerals. Rock physics and phase relations: A handbook of physical constants, 3, 189-204.
Karahan H ., Iplikci S ., Yasar M .and Gurarslan G .; 2014: River flow estimation from upstream flow records using support vector machines. J. Appl. Math ., 2014., https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/714213.
Khalili, M., & Zamani, A. (2016). Application of the rule extraction method to evaluate seismicity of Iran. Geopersia, 6(2), 233-242.
Liu H.-H ., Chang L.-C ., Li C.-W .and Yang, C.-H .; 2018: Particle swarm optimization-based support vector regression for tourist arrivals forecasting. Comput. Intell. Neurosci.,2018., https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/6076475.
Lowrie W .; 2007: Fundamentals of Geophysics. Published in the United States of America by Cambridge University Press, New York,324 pp .
Lu B ., Ni S .and Washburn S. S .; 2015: A support vector regression approach for investigating multianticipative driving behavior. Math. Probl. Eng.,2015., https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/701926.
Madhiarasan, M., & Louzazni, M. (2022). Analysis of artificial neural network: architecture, types, and forecasting applications. Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering, 2022.
Mihi, A., Ghazela, R., & Wissal, D. (2022). Mapping potential desertification-prone areas in North-Eastern Algeria using logistic regression model, GIS, and remote sensing techniques. Environmental Earth Sciences, 81(15), 385.
Moazenzadeh R ., Mohammadi B ., Shamshirband S .and Chau K.-w .; 2018: Coupling a firefly algorithm with support vector regression to predict evaporation in northern Iran. Eng. Appl. Comput. Fluid Mech., 12(1), 584-597 https://doi.org/10.1080/19942060.2018.1482476.
Mortazavi M., Heuss-Assbichler S.and Shahri M.; 2017: Hydrothermal systems in the salt domes of south Iran. Procedia Earth Planet.17, 913-916. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeps.2017.01.016
Muñoz M ., Miranda E .and Sánchez P. J .; 2017: A Fuzzy System for Estimating Premium Cost of Option Exchange Using Mamdani Inference: Derivatives Market of Mexico. Int. J. Comput. Intell. Syst .,10(1),153 - 164 ., https://doi.org/10.2991/ijcis.2017.10.1.11.
Nokhbatolfoghahaei A ., Nezafati N ., Ghorbani M .and Abdolabadi B. E .; 2019: Evidence for origin and alteration in the dolomites of salt diapirs, Larestan, Southern Iran. Carbonates Evaporites ., 34(2), 389-403., https://doi.org/10.1007/s13146-017-0399-5.
Olusanya, M. O. Arasomwan, M. A. Adewumi, A. O. (2015). Particle swarm optimization algorithm for optimizing assignment of blood in blood banking system. Computational and mathematical methods in medicine, 2015.
Pace, F., Santilano, A., & Godio, A. (2021). A review of geophysical modeling based on particle swarm optimization. Surveys in Geophysics, 42(3), 505-549.
Raj, A. S., Oliver, D. H., & Srinivas, Y. (2015). Geoelectrical data inversion by clustering techniques of fuzzy logic to estimate the subsurface layer model. International Journal of Geophysics, 2015.
Rout S. S ., Misra B. B .and Samanta S .; 2018: Competency mapping with Sugeno fuzzy inference system for variable pay determination: A case study. Ain Shams Eng. J,. 9(4), 2215-2226., https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asej.2017.03.007.
Sadeghi, R., Muossavi Harami, R., Kadkhodaie, A., Mahboubi, A., Kadkhodaie, R., & Ashtari, A. (2021). Integration of 3D seismic attributes and well logs for Asmari reservoir characterization in the Ramshir oilfield, the Dezful Embayment, SW Iran. Geopersia, 11(1), 1-21.
Sarker, I. H. (2021). Deep learning: a comprehensive overview on techniques, taxonomy, applications and research directions. SN Computer Science, 2(6), 420.
Sun X ., Bi Y., Karami H ., Naini S ., Band S. S.and Mosavi A .; 2021:  Hybrid model of support vector regression and fruitfly optimization algorithm for predicting ski-jump spillway scour geometry. Engineering Applications of Computational Fluid Mechanics., 15(1), 272-291.,
Taghizadeh Farahmand, F., & Eslami, M. (2020). Evaluation of the Deterministic Seismic Hazard by using Fuzzy Inference System, Case Study: Tabriz city, Iran. Iranian Journal of Geophysics, 14(4), 19-28.
Warsitzka M., Kley J. and Kukowski, N. ;2015 : Analogue experiments of salt flow and pillow growth due to basement  faulting and differential loading. Solid earth6(1), 9-31. https://doi.org/10.5194/se-6-9-2015
Waszkiewicz, S., Krakowska-Madejska, P., & Puskarczyk, E. (2019). Estimation of absolute permeability using artificial neural networks (multilayer perceptrons) based on well logs and laboratory data from Silurian and Ordovician deposits in SE Poland. Acta Geophysica, 67, 1885-1894.
Yu, S., & Ma, J. (2021). Deep learning for geophysics: Current and future trends. Rev. Geophys., 59(3), e2021RG000742.