Rock physics characterization of shale reservoirs: a case study

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی‌

نویسنده

شرکت CGG

چکیده

Unconventional resources are typically very complex to model, and the production from this type of reservoirs is influenced by such complexity in their microstructure. This microstructure complexity is normally reflected in their geophysical response, and makes them more difficult to interpret. Rock physics play an important role to resolve such complexity by integrating different subsurface disciplines. This study presents two rock physics workflows for a deeper understanding of shale reservoirs with regard to their matrix brittleness and kerogen content maturity. It first employs petrophysical stochastic modelling on the available conventional well logs. Then, the results of well log interpretation are used as input into a rock physics model to generate a complete set of elastic logs. Furthermore, these elastics logs are converted to Young modulus and Poisson’s ratio for highlighting brittle zones, which were confirmed by production figures. Moreover, another rock physics workflow is proposed to combine geological information and petrophysical data to characterize total organic carbon content of the shale. This rock physics model inverts velocity into its main geological components (organics, clay and clean velocities), which could furthermore be used for velocity interpretation considering geological processes. One of the velocity inverted components has a direct relationship with total organic carbon and its maturity that is normally calculated using Passey method. Passey method uses three different well logs for modelling kerogen maturity along a well path. However, implementation of this model at locations far away from the well is a big challenge for field development. The reason is the difficulty of tying Passey method results with the elastic properties and seismic cubes. The proposed geology guided rock physics model enables us to find a relationship between kerogen maturity and P-wave velocity from sonic logs. This model, furthermore, can provide a tool to somehow extend Passey method into seismic cubes.

کلیدواژه‌ها


عنوان مقاله [English]

Rock physics characterization of shale reservoirs: a case study

نویسنده [English]

  • Mohammad Reza Saberi
CGG, Bordewijklaan
چکیده [English]

Unconventional resources are typically very complex to model, and the production from this type of reservoirs is influenced by such complexity in their microstructure. This microstructure complexity is normally reflected in their geophysical response, and makes them more difficult to interpret. Rock physics play an important role to resolve such complexity by integrating different subsurface disciplines. This study presents two rock physics workflows for a deeper understanding of shale reservoirs with regard to their matrix brittleness and kerogen content maturity. It first employs petrophysical stochastic modelling on the available conventional well logs. Then, the results of well log interpretation are used as input into a rock physics model to generate a complete set of elastic logs. Furthermore, these elastics logs are converted to Young modulus and Poisson’s ratio for highlighting brittle zones, which were confirmed by production figures. Moreover, another rock physics workflow is proposed to combine geological information and petrophysical data to characterize total organic carbon content of the shale. This rock physics model inverts velocity into its main geological components (organics, clay and clean velocities), which could furthermore be used for velocity interpretation considering geological processes. One of the velocity inverted components has a direct relationship with total organic carbon and its maturity that is normally calculated using Passey method. Passey method uses three different well logs for modelling kerogen maturity along a well path. However, implementation of this model at locations far away from the well is a big challenge for field development. The reason is the difficulty of tying Passey method results with the elastic properties and seismic cubes. The proposed geology guided rock physics model enables us to find a relationship between kerogen maturity and P-wave velocity from sonic logs. This model, furthermore, can provide a tool to somehow extend Passey method into seismic cubes.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • rock physics
  • unconventional reservoirs
  • Shale gas
  • seismic reservoir characterization
Ahmadov, R. S., 2011, Microtextural, elastic and transport properties of source rocks: Ph. D. Dissertation, Stanford University.
Berryman, J. G., 1992, Single-scattering approximations for coefficients in Biot’s equations of poroelasticity: Journal of Acoustic Society of America, 91, 551–571.
Bandyopadhyay, K., Sain, R., Liu E., Harris, C., Martinez, M., Payne, M., and Zhu, Y., 2012, Rock Property Inversion in Organic- Rich Shale: Uncertainties, Ambiguities, and Pitfalls Society of Exploration Geophysicists International Annual Meeting: Technical Program Extended Abstracts.
Carcione, J. M., and Avseth, P., 2015, Rock-physics templates for clay-rich source rocks: Geophysics, 80, 481-500.
Gassmann, F., 1951, Uber die elastizität poröser medien: Vierteljahrsschrift der Naturforschenden Gesellschaft in Zürich, 96, 1-23.
Hashin, Z., and Shtrikman, S., 1963, A variational approach to the elastic behavior of multiphase materials: Journal of Mechanics and Physics of Solids, 11, 127–140.
Hill, R., 1952, The elastic behavior of crystalline aggregate: Proceeding of Physical Society, 65, 349–354.
Hu, Q., Hu, H. F., Lin, Z. L., and Cai, X. H., 2017, Optimization of Brittleness Estimation Using Rock Physics Templates: 79th European Association of Geoscientist and Engineers Conference and Exhibition 2017.
Jensen, F., and Rael, H., 2012, Stochastic Modeling and Petrophysical Analysis of Unconventional Shales: Spraberry-Wolfcamp Example, White paper, https://www.cgg.com/data/1/rec_docs/3034 Spraberry- Wolfcamp-WhitePaper.pdf
Jensen, F., and Saberi, M. R., 2014, Modeling of Brittle Zones in Unconventional Reservoirs: A case study from West Texas: Petroleum Exploration Society of Great Britain, Abstract.
Kuster, G. T., and Toksöz, M. N., 1974, Velocity and attenuation of seismic waves in two phase media: Part I. Theoretical formulations: Geophysics, 39, 587-606.
Liu, Y., 2013, Workflows for Sweet Spots Identification in Shale Plays Using Seismic Inversion and Well Logs, GeoConvention 2013
Mavko, G., Mukerji, T., and Dvorkin, J., 1998, The rock physics handbook. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
Mitchell, W. K., and Nelson, R. J., 1988, A practical Approach to Statistical Log Analysis. Society of Petrophysicist and Well Log Analysts: 29th Annual Logging Symposium.
Passey, Q. R., Creaney, S., Kulla, J. B., Moretti, F. J., and Stroud, J. D., 1990, A Practical Model for Organic Richness from Porosity and Resistivity Logs: American Association of Petroleum Geologists Bulletin, 74, 1777-1794.
Passey, Q. R., Bohacs, K. M., Klimentidis, W. L. R., and Sinha, S., 2010, From Oil-Prone Source Rock to Gas-Producing Shale Reservoir-Geologic and Petrophysical Characterization of Unconventional Shale-Gas Reservoirs, SPE 131350.
Rickman, R., Mullen, M., Petre, E., Grieser, B., and Kundert, D., 2008, A practical use of shale petrophysics for stimulation design optimization: All shale plays are not clones of the Barnett Shale. Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition: Society of Petroleum Engineers, 11528.
Saberi, M. R., 2014, A Rock Physics Model for Unconventional Reservoirs Characterization: Wolfcamp Shale Example: EAGE/FESM Joint Regional Conference Petrophysics Meets Geoscience, Extended Abstracts.
Saberi, M. R., 2017, A closer look at rock physics models and their assisted interpretation in seismic exploration: Iranian Journal of Geophysics, 10(5), 71-84.
Scotchman, I. C., 2016, Shale gas and fracking: exploration for unconventional hydrocarbons: Proceedings of Geologists’ Association, 127(5), 535-551.
Sondergeld, C. H., Newsham, K. E., Comisky, J. T., Rice, M. C., and Rai, C. S., 2010, Petrophysical considerations in evaluating and producing shale gas resources: Presented at Society of Petroleum Engineers Unconventional Gas Conference, 131768.
Varga, R., Lotti, R., Pachos, A., Holden, T., Marini, I., Spadafora, E., and Pendral, J., 2012, Seismic inversion in the Barnett Shale successfully pinpoints sweet spots to optimize wellbore placement and reduce drilling risks. Society of Exploration Geophysicists International Annual Meeting: Technical Program Extended Abstracts, Las Vegas.
Vernik, L., 2016, Seismic Petrophysics in Quantitative Interpretation. Society of Exploration Geophysicists
Wood, A. W., 1955, A Textbook of Sound: The MacMillan Publishers, New York, 360 pages.
Wyllie, M., Gregory, A. R., and Gardner, G. H. F., 1956, Elastic wave velocities in heterogeneous and porous media: Geophysics, 21(1), 41-70.
Xu, S., and White, R. E., 1995, A new velocity model for clay-sand mixtures: Geophysical Prospecting, 43, 91-118.
Yenugu, M., and Han, D., 2013, Seismic characterization of kerogen maturity: An example from Bakken shale. Society of Exploration Geophysicists International Annual Meeting: Technical Program Extended Abstracts, Houston.