Arctic polar vortex dynamics during winters 2015/2016 and 2016/2017

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی‌

نویسندگان

Ph.D., Institute of Monitoring of Climatic and Ecological Systems of the Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Russian

چکیده

In this work, we considered the role of the dynamic barrier weakening in winter in polar ozone depletion from late winter to spring with the example of the Arctic polar vortex dynamics in 2015/2016 and 2016/2017 by the vortex delineation method using geopotential. The main characteristics (vortex area, wind speed along the vortex edge, temperature and ozone mass mixing ratio inside the vortex) were calculated using the ERA5 reanalysis data based on the fact that the Arctic polar vortex edge at the 50, 70 and 100 hPa levels is determined by the geopotential values 19.5´104, 17.5´104 and 15.4´104 m2/s2, respectively. The geopotential values characterizing the polar vortex edge were determined from the maximum temperature gradient and maximum wind speed on average for 1979–2021. The dynamic barrier of the polar vortex contributes to lowering the temperature inside the vortex in the lower stratosphere and prevents the propagation of air masses into the vortex, creating conditions for ozone depletion from late winter to spring with the appearance of solar radiation. The polar vortex is characterized by the presence of a dynamic barrier, when the wind speed along the entire edge of the vortex is more than 20, 18 and 16 m/s at the 50, 70 and 100 hPa levels, respectively. In the winter-spring 2015/2016, almost no weakening of the dynamic barrier was observed, which contributed to a temperature decrease inside the vortex, the formation of polar stratospheric clouds and the subsequent occurrence of heterogeneous and photochemical reactions of ozone destruction, while in the winter 2016/2017, a frequent weakening of the dynamic barrier was observed in the lower stratosphere at the 50, 70 and 100 hPa levels, accompanied by an increase in temperature and ozone content inside the vortex as a result of the penetration of warm, ozone-rich air masses into the vortex.
 

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات


عنوان مقاله [English]

Arctic polar vortex dynamics during winters 2015/2016 and 2016/2017

نویسندگان [English]

  • Vladimir Zuev
  • Ekaterina Savelieva
  • Alexey Pavlinsky
Ph.D., Institute of Monitoring of Climatic and Ecological Systems of the Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Russian
چکیده [English]

In this work, we considered the role of the dynamic barrier weakening in winter in polar ozone depletion from late winter to spring with the example of the Arctic polar vortex dynamics in 2015/2016 and 2016/2017 by the vortex delineation method using geopotential. The main characteristics (vortex area, wind speed along the vortex edge, temperature and ozone mass mixing ratio inside the vortex) were calculated using the ERA5 reanalysis data based on the fact that the Arctic polar vortex edge at the 50, 70 and 100 hPa levels is determined by the geopotential values 19.5´104, 17.5´104 and 15.4´104 m2/s2, respectively. The geopotential values characterizing the polar vortex edge were determined from the maximum temperature gradient and maximum wind speed on average for 1979–2021. The dynamic barrier of the polar vortex contributes to lowering the temperature inside the vortex in the lower stratosphere and prevents the propagation of air masses into the vortex, creating conditions for ozone depletion from late winter to spring with the appearance of solar radiation. The polar vortex is characterized by the presence of a dynamic barrier, when the wind speed along the entire edge of the vortex is more than 20, 18 and 16 m/s at the 50, 70 and 100 hPa levels, respectively. In the winter-spring 2015/2016, almost no weakening of the dynamic barrier was observed, which contributed to a temperature decrease inside the vortex, the formation of polar stratospheric clouds and the subsequent occurrence of heterogeneous and photochemical reactions of ozone destruction, while in the winter 2016/2017, a frequent weakening of the dynamic barrier was observed in the lower stratosphere at the 50, 70 and 100 hPa levels, accompanied by an increase in temperature and ozone content inside the vortex as a result of the penetration of warm, ozone-rich air masses into the vortex.
 

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Arctic polar vortex
  • polar ozone depletion
  • dynamic barrier
  • vortex area
  • wind speed at the vortex edge
  • polar stratospheric clouds
Butler, A. H., Seidel, D. J., Hardiman, S. C., Butchart, N., Birner, T., and Match, A., 2015, Defining sudden stratospheric warmings: Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, 96(11), 1913–1928, doi: 10.1175/BAMS-D-13-00173.1.
Charlton, A. J., and Polvani, L. M., 2007, A new look at stratospheric sudden warmings, Part I: Climatology and modeling benchmarks: Journal of Climate, 20(3), 449–469, doi: 10.1175/JCLI3996.1.
Charlton, A. J., Polvani, L. M., Perlwitz, J., et al., 2007, A new look at stratospheric sudden warmings, Part II: Evaluation of numerical model simulations: Journal of Climate, 20(3), 470–488, doi: 10.1175/JCLI3994.1.
Finlayson-Pitts, B. J., and Pitts, J. N. 2000, Chemistry of the Upper and Lower Atmosphere: Theory, Experiments, and Applications: Academic Press.
Hersbach, H., Bell, B., Berrisford, P., et al., 2020, The ERA5 global reanalysis: Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society, 146(729), 1–51, doi: 10.1002/qj.3803.
Khosrawi, F., Kirner, O., Sinnhuber, B. M., et al., 2017, Denitrification, dehydration and ozone loss during the 2015/2016 Arctic winter: Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 17(21), 12893–12910, doi: 10.5194/acp-17-12893-2017.
Kuttippurath, J., and Nikulin, G., 2012, A comparative study of the major sudden stratospheric warmings in the Arctic winters 2003/2004–2009/2010: Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 12(17), 8115–8129, doi: 10.5194/acp-12-8115-2012.
Limpasuvan, V., Thompson, D. W. J., and Hartmann, D. L., 2004, The life cycle of the Northern Hemisphere sudden stratospheric warmings: Journal of Climate, 17(13), 2584–2596, doi: 10.1175/1520-0442(2004)017<2584:TLCOTN>2.0.CO;2.
Manney, G. L., Santee, M. L., Rex, M., et al., 2011, Unprecedented Arctic ozone loss in 2011: Nature, 478(7370), 469–475, doi: 10.1038/nature10556.
Manney, G. L., Zurek, R. W., O'Neill, A., and Swinbank, R., 1994, On the motion of air through the stratospheric polar vortex: Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences, 51(20), 2973-2994, doi: 10.1175/1520-0469(1994)051<2973:OTMOAT>2.0.CO;2.
Matthewman, N. J., Esler, J. G., Charlton-Perez, A. J., and Polvani, L. M., 2009, A new look at stratospheric sudden warmings, Part III: Polar vortex evolution and vertical structure: Journal of Climate, 22(6), 1566-1585, doi: 10.1175/2008JCLI2365.1.
Newman, P. A., Nash, E. R., and Rosenfield, J. E., 2001, What controls the temperature of the Arctic stratosphere during the spring?: Journal of Geophysical Research, 106(17), 19999–20010, doi: 10.1029/2000JD000061.
Sobel, A. H., Plumb, R. A., and Waugh, D. W., 1997, Methods of calculating transport across the polar vortex edge: Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences, 54(18), 2241–2260, doi: 10.1175/1520-0469(1997)054<2241:MOCTAT>2.0.CO;2.
Solomon, S., 1999, Stratospheric ozone depletion: a review of concepts and history: Reviews of Geophysics, 37(3), 275–316, doi: 10.1029/1999RG900008.
Solomon, S., Kinnison, D., Bandoro, J., and Garcia, R., 2015, Simulation of polar ozone depletion: An update: Journal of Geophysical Research, 120(15), 7958–7974, doi: 10.1002/2015JD023365.
Solomon, S., Portmann R. W., Sasaki, T., Hofmann, D. J., and Thompson, D. W. J., 2005, Four decades of ozonesonde measurements over Antarctica: Journal of Geophysical Research, 110(21), D21311, doi: 10.1029/2005JD005917.
Varotsos, C., 2002, The southern hemisphere ozone hole split in 2002: Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 9, 375–376, doi: 10.1007/BF02987584.
Varotsos, C. A., Cracknell, A. P., and Tzanis, C., 2012, The exceptional ozone depletion over the Arctic in January–March 2011: Remote Sensing Letters, 3(4), 343–352, doi: 10.1080/01431161.2011.597792.
Varotsos, C. A., Efstathiou, M. N., and Christodoulakis, J., 2020, The lesson learned from the unprecedented ozone hole in the Arctic in 2020; A novel nowcasting tool for such extreme events: Journal of Atmospheric and Solar-Terrestrial Physics, 207, 105330, doi: 10.1016/j.jastp.2020.105330.
Voigt, C., Dörnbrack, A., Wirth, M., et al., 2018, Widespread polar stratospheric ice clouds in the 2015–2016 Arctic winter – implications for ice nucleation: Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 18(21), 15623–15641, doi: 10.5194/acp-18-15623-2018.
von der Gathen, P., Rex, M., Harris, N. R. P., et al., 1995, Observational evidence for chemical ozone depletion over the Arctic in winter 1991–92: Nature, 375, 131–134, doi: 10.1038/375131a0.
Waugh, D. W., and Randel, W. J., 1999, Climatology of Arctic and Antarctic polar vortices using elliptical diagnostics: Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences, 56(11), 1594–1613, doi: 10.1175/1520-0469(1999)056<1594:COAAAP>2.0.CO;2.
Waugh, D. W., Randel, W. J., Pawson, S., Newman, P. A., and Nash, E. R., 1999, Persistence of the lower stratospheric polar vortices: Journal of Geophysical Research, 104(22), 27191–27201, doi: 10.1029/1999JD900795.
Waugh, D. W., Sobel, A. H., and Polvani, L. M., 2017, What is the polar vortex and how does it influence weather?: Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, 98(1), 37–44, doi: 10.1175/BAMS-D-15-00212.1.
Zuev, V. V., and Savelieva, E., 2019, The role of the polar vortex strength during winter in Arctic ozone depletion from late winter to spring: Polar Science, 22, 100469, doi: 10.1016/j.polar.2019.06.001.
Zuev, V. V., and Savelieva, E., 2020, Arctic polar vortex dynamics during winter 2006/2007: Polar Science, 25, 100532, doi: 10.1016/j.polar.2020.100532.
Zuev, V. V., and Savelieva, E., 2022a, Antarctic polar vortex dynamics during spring 2002: Journal of Earth System Science, 131(2), 119, doi: 10.1007/s12040-022-01879-0.
Zuev, V. V., and Savelieva, E., 2022b, Antarctic polar vortex dynamics depending on wind speed along the vortex edge: Pure and Applied Geophysics, 179(6–7), 2609–2616, doi: 10.1007/s00024-022-03054-4.